Where Is Akan Weeks? (Part 1)
By UbongAbasi Ise
“It is not the destination where
you end up but the mishaps and memories you create along the way” – Penelope
Riley
Sunday 10th
December 2017 marked exactly one year since the centre of the Reigners Church
building could no longer hold, and the roof members had to fall apart, landing
brutally on the mass of humans congregated to witness the event of bishopric
enthronement of Apostle (Dr.) Akan Weeks. Of course, yours truly was there on
the spot on that black Saturday, the 10th of December 2016, seeing
it all right from when the steels descended at about 11:40 a.m. but managed to whizz
through it all out of sheer survival instinct. As an eyewitness, it was a heartrending
sight to behold: it was a terrible scene full of blood, mangled bodies,
screeching of pain, wailing of death, tears and despair. The horror and trauma were enough for the living
witnesses who were there at Uyo Kilometer 1 to bear.
Each time I join the fray in discussing the issue of
unfortunate building collapse, I couldn’t help being overtaken by equal mix of
emotions and shock because I was at the verge of joining the rest of the fallen
victims. When I heard about the attendant abandonment and neglect of the first
and second degree victims and their families by the state government, I feel
the pain and trauma they are battling each day within their varied capacities
to overcome. Who could have thought that after a year, justice for the victims
would still be far away from the horizon?
Akan Weeks |
Notwithstanding, it was something laudable in the wake of
the incident when the Governor constituted a Commission of Inquiry under the chairmanship of Justice Umoekeyo
Essang (rtd), to look into the circumstances that led to the collapse of
the church. The terms of reference were to investigate and probe the immediate
and remote cause of the collapse of the building and examine the role played by
any person, institution or authorities and the consequences of such roles in
the collapse of the church building; to identify any person, institution or
authorities responsible either remotely or immediately in respect of the
collapse of the church building; recommend appropriate sanctions and or actions
against all persons found culpable in the said church building collapse;
examine generally all the circumstances surrounding the collapsed church
building and recommend measures and actions to be taken by any person,
institution or authority which would guard against future occurrences; indict
persons, organizations, groups or otherwise found culpable in the course of its
inquiry and make appropriate recommendations to Government; and make further
examinations or inquiries which may in its opinion, give effect generally to
the terms of reference.
But the commission of inquiry turned out to be a theater
of drama of some sort where accusations, counter-accusations, blackmail,
innuendoes, comedy, and eccentricities played out. Professionals and key players in property
sector were surprisingly implicated. At the end, all fingers seemed to
point towards Akan Weeks, and it was as if the clergyman was a sole centrifugal
force revving up the whole maelstrom.
The sitting
which took place in January 2017 offered a platform where shocking testimonies were
reeled out. It exposed Akan Weeks’s
penchant for titles, and let the world know that Weeks was proudly going about
with the customized doctorate degree of humanitarian services awarded to him by
Niger-Delta youths group – a group that was not even a degree awarding
institution. That aside, on Friday 20th January 2017, Akan Weeks
claimed before the panel that he was already a bishop before the incident, and that
the botched December 10 event was merely an enthronement ceremony. With blunt
haughtiness, Weeks said he could be addressed a bishop. But he forgot that he
had, immediately after the incident, gone on air to say that he was no longer
interested in the bishopric office.
In respect to
the terms of reference of the commission of inquiry, there were salient issues
that were raised, which entails that something should have been done urgently. For
instance, the testimony of Town Planner Effiong Akpan explained how Akan Weeks
flouted the orders of Uyo Capital City Authority five times to erect such a
massive structure at the plot situated within the site not cleared for any
physical development or issuance of certificate of occupancy because the plot
was situated within the area of conservation as declared by the state
government. Attention of the Commission was drawn to the letter which refused
the Reigners’s Church application for certificate of occupancy, and the letter was
dated 22nd February, 2012, addressed with the reference number:
UCCDA/AD/104 Vol. 7/276 to the Executive Secretary, Land Use and Allocation
Committee, State Secretariat Complex, Uyo with the caption, ‘Site Not Cleared:
Reigners Bible Church International Incorporated’ with the survey plan number,
80/JJ/1/2010/2, and signed by Town Planner Etop Stephen Uko for the secretary,
head of administration. TP Effiong Akpan had explained that a threat of gully
erosion was the origin of the problem that led to the declaration of the area
where the site of Reigners Church is located a government conservation area
because in the year 2000, parts of Eka Street in Uyo was taken over by the
ravine; part of University of Uyo was also taken over by the ravine; and the
compound of late Obong Michael Udo Eka collapsed with the ravine. Having notice
all these problems, in the year 2000, all land bordering the ravine areas of
Idim Ikot Ntuen Offot, tributaries of Ikpa River, Idim Eniong, Ikot Ayan, Ikot
Ntuen Offot, Ekpri Nsukara, Anua, Uyo, Afaha Oku, Ndue Otong all in Uyo Local
Government Area was declared a Forest Reserve Area and this was published in
The Pioneer Newspaper of 20th October, 2000. Had Akan Weeks regarded
the notices wouldn’t the calamity be averted?
The immediate
cause that precipitated the incident was also linked to Akan Weeks’s insistence
on the removal of the scaffold which allows radial bracing with the pollines
and girders to achieve a rigid body. In his testimony before the Commission of
Inquiry, Mr. Idorenyin Daniel Udo of Whitesteel Integrated Services who was
said to be contracted by Apostle Akan Weeks to fabricate and install the roof
of the failed church building, said that Mr. Weeks put intense pressure on him
from 2nd December 2016 to remove the scaffold that supported the
weight of the roof, threatening to arrest him and his workers should he fail to
comply, but he refused. Udo said that after all effort to get him remove the
scaffold proved abortive, one Engr. Essiet, who is one of the members of church
building committee, called scaffolders elsewhere on Thursday 8th
December 2016 to come for the removal of the scaffold.
Another witness, Engr. Lawi
Stephen, who allegedly designed the roof of the building, said veraciously, “I
was there when Apostle Akan Weeks was telling Idorenyin Udo that if he doesn’t
remove the scaffold, he would slap him”. Stephen disclosed to the panel that
few days before the collapse, Akan Weeks had mounted serious pressure on
Idorenyin Udo, the fabricator and installer of the roof, to remove the scaffold
that was supporting the weight of the roof structure.
After the
removal of the scaffold, Idorenyin Udo revealed that he had noticed a crack on
Friday 9th December at the right side of the octagonal church
building by the second beam which he drew the attention of the site supervisor,
but the call was not heeded. He suggested that the crack might have contributed
to the collapse of the building on Saturday 10th December, 2016.
However, months waiting for the
report rolled by, and the commission finally came out with the much awaited
report in June 2017, and Akwa Ibom people were with great hopes that finally
the state government would address the anomalies surrounding the church
building collapse, and also forestall occurrence of similar tragedy in the
future. But it is surprising that the state government is appearing
pusillanimous, and till now it has not made any concrete move towards the
implementation of the report. Udom’s insouciance about the whole thing is
inexplicable to the extent that one wonders if he even cares about human lives
at all.
It is
unfortunate that the state government could be insensitive towards the matter
of live and dead of the citizens. Apart from bringing the culprits to book, the
implementation of the report could have influenced the existing policies on
housing in the state. For instance, the witness, Town Planner Effiong Akpan of
Uyo Capital City Development Authority (UCCDA) said that all buildings in Uyo
reservation area are illegal, and there are possibilities of imminent collapse
because due process has not been followed in the developmental processes while adding
that the area is subjected to landslide anytime.
Given the
volatility of housing situation as partly captured above, for how long will
state government keep on sitting on the report? How safe are the people
resident in the state? Are there some sacred cows implicated in the report that
the government thinks that it is convenient to let the sleeping dog lie? Has
Udom Emmanuel’s government abandoned its obligation of safeguarding the lives
of the people? What are the plight of the victims and their relatives affected
by the event of the building collapse? These questions are begging urgent
answers.
…To be
continued
Yes! I am UbongAbasi Ise. For
Comment Send SMS to 08189914609 | ubongabasiise@gmail.com
Read also Reigners Church Collapse: My Own Story
Comments
Post a Comment